[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170517043445.GZ17481@vireshk-i7>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 10:04:45 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq:- Handle return value of
clk_prepare_enable
On 16-05-17, 12:41, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> Here, Clock enable can failed. So adding an error check for
> clk_prepare_enable.
Rewrite it as:
clk_prepare_enable() can fail here and we must check its return value.
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
> index 1b9bcd7..4c30103 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
> @@ -127,7 +127,12 @@ static int kirkwood_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(priv.cpu_clk);
> }
>
> - clk_prepare_enable(priv.cpu_clk);
> + err = clk_prepare_enable(priv.cpu_clk);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(priv.dev, "Unable to prepare cpuclk\n");
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> kirkwood_freq_table[0].frequency = clk_get_rate(priv.cpu_clk) / 1000;
>
> priv.ddr_clk = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "ddrclk");
> @@ -137,7 +142,11 @@ static int kirkwood_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto out_cpu;
> }
>
> - clk_prepare_enable(priv.ddr_clk);
> + err = clk_prepare_enable(priv.ddr_clk);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(priv.dev, "Unable to prepare ddrclk\n");
> + goto out_cpu;
> + }
> kirkwood_freq_table[1].frequency = clk_get_rate(priv.ddr_clk) / 1000;
>
> priv.powersave_clk = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "powersave");
There is one more prepare-enable after this. Why not fix that as well
?
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists