linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Use device_property_read instead of of_property_read in the dw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7a18520a-34c8-2225-d4cd-b6d2522a2fe5@mellanox.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 May 2017 18:07:24 -0400
From:   David Woods <dwoods@...lanox.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC:     Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use device_property_read instead of of_property_read in
 the dw_mmc driver

On 05/15/2017 09:30 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On 25 April 2017 at 17:39, David Woods <dwoods@...lanox.com> wrote:
>>> Using the device_property interfaces allows the dw_mmc driver to work
>>> on platforms which run on either device tree or ACPI.
>> Can you please split this to two separate changes. One for dw_mmc with
>> a proper prefix (mmc: dw_mmc:) and one for the mmc core (prefix "mmc:
>> core:").

Yes, I will do that.

> Btw, for the core part of change I would recommend to check other API
> functions which might go slightly different in case of ACPI vs DT vs
> built-in device properties.
>
> For example, if any code is using of_gpio header and of_ related stuff
> it should be rethought as well (not sure if we would change there
> anything, though worth to double check).
>
I have not purged all references to of_ APIs from the core code. 
However, the ones which remain are specific to hardware I don't have, so 
I wouldn't be able to test those code paths.  Btw, there is no good 
reason I can see to include of_gpio.h here, none of those interfaces 
seem to be used.

-David Woods