lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0bf4723f-dd94-bbbf-21a8-2ec60dff58cb@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2017 09:19:32 -0500
From:   Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:     Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Keerthy J <j-keerthy@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ARM: OMAP2+: AM33XX/AM43XX: Add suspend-resume
 support

Tony,
On 05/16/2017 10:49 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> On 05/16/2017 10:47 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com> [170329 11:52]:
>>> Hi Tony,
>>> On 03/29/2017 12:13 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>> * Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com> [170328 19:00]:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> This series contains the remaining code to enable suspend to mem and
>>>>> standby on
>>>>> am335x and am437x platforms. It depends on the ti-emif-sram series sent
>>>>> here [1].
>>>>
>>>> Looks good to me in general. To remove the dependency, can some
>>>> of this be merged separately without breaking things before [1]?
>>>> Maybe by disabling some of the PM states until [1] is in place?
>>>
>>> Thanks for the feedback. Actually, patch 7 is the only patch with a
>>> dependency to [1]. The rest of the patches just add platform PM support
>>> needed for suspend but won't do much of anything until patch 7 actually
>>> enables the suspend states, so there is no reason why patches 1-6 and patch
>>> 8 can't be merged now.
>>
>> I'm applying patches 1-5 into omap-for-v4.13/soc. Patch 6 needs
>> ack from Russell.
>>
>
> Thanks. I will resend patches 6-8 as a separate series.

On second thought, it's probably best to keep patches 4 and 5 as part of the new 
series as well for review purposes, as they are not added to the build until 
patch 6 but also make use of the asm-offsets macros introduced in patch 6. I 
will send them along with patch 6-8 resend, making the new series patches 4-8.

Regards,
Dave

>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tony
>>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ