lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2017 07:59:24 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>
Cc:     Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Keerthy J <j-keerthy@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ARM: OMAP2+: AM33XX/AM43XX: Add suspend-resume
 support

* Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com> [170518 07:23]:
> Tony,
> On 05/16/2017 10:49 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> > On 05/16/2017 10:47 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com> [170329 11:52]:
> > > > Hi Tony,
> > > > On 03/29/2017 12:13 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > > * Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com> [170328 19:00]:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > This series contains the remaining code to enable suspend to mem and
> > > > > > standby on
> > > > > > am335x and am437x platforms. It depends on the ti-emif-sram series sent
> > > > > > here [1].
> > > > > 
> > > > > Looks good to me in general. To remove the dependency, can some
> > > > > of this be merged separately without breaking things before [1]?
> > > > > Maybe by disabling some of the PM states until [1] is in place?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks for the feedback. Actually, patch 7 is the only patch with a
> > > > dependency to [1]. The rest of the patches just add platform PM support
> > > > needed for suspend but won't do much of anything until patch 7 actually
> > > > enables the suspend states, so there is no reason why patches 1-6 and patch
> > > > 8 can't be merged now.
> > > 
> > > I'm applying patches 1-5 into omap-for-v4.13/soc. Patch 6 needs
> > > ack from Russell.
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks. I will resend patches 6-8 as a separate series.
> 
> On second thought, it's probably best to keep patches 4 and 5 as part of the
> new series as well for review purposes, as they are not added to the build
> until patch 6 but also make use of the asm-offsets macros introduced in
> patch 6. I will send them along with patch 6-8 resend, making the new series
> patches 4-8.

OK dropping 4 and 5 today.

Regards,

Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ