linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 May 2017 18:15:57 -0400
From:   Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, j.vosburgh@...il.com,
        vfalico@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

On 2017-05-19 5:14 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
> Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 11:11:44 -0400
> 
>> As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not
>> removed from the aggregator when they are down, and the active slave count
>> is NOT equal to number of ports in the aggregator, but rather the number
>> of ports in the aggregator that are still enabled.
>   ...
>> Remedy it by using the same logic introduced in
>> 7bb11dc9f59d in __bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info(), so sysfs, procfs and
>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> netlink all report the number of active ports.
> 
> I think you mean to reference commit 0622cab0341c here not 7bb11dc9f59d.

D'oh, yes, you are entirely correct. Should I submit a v2 with that 
correction?

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jarod@...hat.com