lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2017 19:17:05 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     jarod@...hat.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, j.vosburgh@...il.com,
        vfalico@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 18:15:57 -0400

> On 2017-05-19 5:14 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
>> Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 11:11:44 -0400
>> 
>>> As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not
>>> removed from the aggregator when they are down, and the active slave
>>> count
>>> is NOT equal to number of ports in the aggregator, but rather the
>>> number
>>> of ports in the aggregator that are still enabled.
>>   ...
>>> Remedy it by using the same logic introduced in
>>> 7bb11dc9f59d in __bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info(), so sysfs, procfs and
>>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> netlink all report the number of active ports.
>> I think you mean to reference commit 0622cab0341c here not
>> 7bb11dc9f59d.
> 
> D'oh, yes, you are entirely correct. Should I submit a v2 with that
> correction?

Yes, please.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ