linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] phy: for 4.12 -rc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8035cf6f-a89f-e618-f739-896006155e5f@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2017 16:28:24 +0530
From:   Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] phy: for 4.12 -rc

Hi Greg,

On Monday 22 May 2017 03:56 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 08:13:27PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> Please find the pull request for 4.12 -rc below.
>>
>> Here we move all the phy drivers to vendor specific directories (so that it's
>> easier to manage) and a couple of fixes in phy-qcom-qmp driver.
> 
> Wait, why do this so late in the review cycle?  This isn't a -rc3 fix,
> it's a -rc1 change.  I can't take this now at all, sorry.
> 
> I could take it during the -rc1 merge window, that would have been a
> good time for it, like the last few days of it?  How about doing that
> the next time?

I thought immediately after -rc1 would be a good time when no new phy drivers
would be added. But yes, last few days of the merge window should be ideal.
Will take up this file movement during the next merge window.

Thanks
Kishon