linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] phy: for 4.12 -rc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170522133838.GA6863@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2017 15:38:38 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] phy: for 4.12 -rc

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:28:24PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Monday 22 May 2017 03:56 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 08:13:27PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >> Hi Greg,
> >>
> >> Please find the pull request for 4.12 -rc below.
> >>
> >> Here we move all the phy drivers to vendor specific directories (so that it's
> >> easier to manage) and a couple of fixes in phy-qcom-qmp driver.
> > 
> > Wait, why do this so late in the review cycle?  This isn't a -rc3 fix,
> > it's a -rc1 change.  I can't take this now at all, sorry.
> > 
> > I could take it during the -rc1 merge window, that would have been a
> > good time for it, like the last few days of it?  How about doing that
> > the next time?
> 
> I thought immediately after -rc1 would be a good time when no new phy drivers
> would be added.

You sent it to me on Friday, after rc1 was released on Saturday, that's
almost a full week after what I would think "immediately" would be :)

thanks,

greg k-h