[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41703c16-f2c4-7f35-b445-33bf35ea7f56@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 09:30:05 -0400
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] doc,xen: document hypervisor sysfs nodes for xen
On 05/22/2017 04:56 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Today only a few sysfs nodes under /sys/hypervisor/ are documented
> for Xen in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor-pmu. Rename
> this file to Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor and add
> descriptions of the other nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
> ---
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor-pmu | 23 -----
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor
> delete mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor-pmu
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor
I wonder whether at least some of the non-pmu entries should by now be
considered stable.
-boris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists