[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <88d8c261-ec9d-f912-437c-6ae4b9410443@citrix.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 14:33:20 +0100
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
CC: <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] xen: add sysfs node for guest type
On 22/05/17 09:57, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Currently there is no reliable user interface inside a Xen guest to
> determine its type (e.g. HVM, PV or PVH). Instead of letting user mode
> try to determine this by various rather hacky mechanisms (parsing of
> boot messages before they are gone, trying to make use of known subtle
> differences in behavior of some instructions), add a sysfs node
> /sys/hypervisor/guest_type to explicitly deliver this information as
> it is known to the kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
> ---
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor | 13 +++++++++++++
> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 3 +++
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 3 +++
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c | 6 ++++--
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c | 1 +
> drivers/xen/sys-hypervisor.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> include/xen/xen.h | 2 ++
> 7 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor
> index 443196f0aa1c..06850f74ebd4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor
> @@ -19,6 +19,19 @@ Contact: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
> Description:
> Compiler which was used to build the Xen hypervisor
>
> +What: /sys/hypervisor/guest_type
> +Date: May 2017
> +KernelVersion: 4.12
> +Contact: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
> +Description:
> + Type of guest:
> + "native": standard guest type on arm
> + "HVM": fully virtualized guest (x86)
> + "PV": paravirtualized guest (x86)
> + "PVH": fully virtualized guest without legacy emulation (x86)
> + "PVHVM": fully virtualized guest using paravirtualized
> + interfaces (e.g. interrupts, timers) (x86)
I'm not sure this is wise split. PVHVM is a spectrum which changes
dynamically, especially in the presence of hardware APIC support.
I'd suggest guest type being straight PV or HVM (being the container
type), and a list of items (interrupts, timers, legacy emulation) which
are either using paravirt or native interfaces, or are not used at all.
~Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists