lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1495477922.20961.26.camel@synopsys.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2017 18:32:02 +0000
From:   Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
To:     "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
CC:     Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com>,
        "ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com" <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
        "a.hajda@...sung.com" <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        "architt@...eaurora.org" <architt@...eaurora.org>,
        "daniel.vetter@...ll.ch" <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        "laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com" 
        <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        "airlied@...ux.ie" <airlied@...ux.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] drm: arc: Use crtc->mode_valid() callback

Hi Jose,

The only nitpicking note from my side is patch name.

Probably full driver name as "arcpgu" might give a bit more context
especially if later something else from ARC appears in "drm" folder.
But IMHO that doesn't worth another respin.

On Fri, 2017-05-19 at 01:52 +0100, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Now that we have a callback to check if crtc supports a given mode
> we can use it in arcpgu so that we restrict the number of probbed
> modes to the ones we can actually display.
> 
> This is specially useful because arcpgu crtc is responsible to set
> a clock value in the commit() stage but unfortunatelly this clock
> does not support all the needed ranges.
> 
> Also, remove the atomic_check() callback as mode_valid() callback
> will be called before.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>
> Cc: Carlos Palminha <palminha@...opsys.com>
> Cc: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>

Reviewed-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ