[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170523163341.Horde.9ys90CmTnWtlq_NxAO5TqfN@gator4166.hostgator.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 16:33:41 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [mfd] question about potential null pointer dereference
Hello everybody,
While looking into Coverity ID 1408830 I ran into the following piece
of code at drivers/mfd/wm831x-spi.c:26
26static int wm831x_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
27{
28 struct wm831x_pdata *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&spi->dev);
29 const struct spi_device_id *id = spi_get_device_id(spi);
30 const struct of_device_id *of_id;
31 struct wm831x *wm831x;
32 enum wm831x_parent type;
33 int ret;
34
35 if (spi->dev.of_node) {
36 of_id = of_match_device(wm831x_of_match, &spi->dev);
37 type = (enum wm831x_parent)of_id->data;
38 } else {
39 type = (enum wm831x_parent)id->driver_data;
40 }
41
42 wm831x = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(struct wm831x),
GFP_KERNEL);
43 if (wm831x == NULL)
44 return -ENOMEM;
45
46 spi->mode = SPI_MODE_0;
47
48 spi_set_drvdata(spi, wm831x);
49 wm831x->dev = &spi->dev;
50 wm831x->type = type;
51
52 wm831x->regmap = devm_regmap_init_spi(spi, &wm831x_regmap_config);
53 if (IS_ERR(wm831x->regmap)) {
54 ret = PTR_ERR(wm831x->regmap);
55 dev_err(wm831x->dev, "Failed to allocate register
map: %d\n",
56 ret);
57 return ret;
58 }
59
60 if (pdata)
61 memcpy(&wm831x->pdata, pdata, sizeof(*pdata));
62
63 return wm831x_device_init(wm831x, spi->irq);
64}
The issue here is that there is a potential NULL pointer dereference
at line 37, in case function of_match_device() returns NULL.
Maybe a patch like the following could be applied in order to avoid
any chance of a NULL pointer dereference:
index c332e28..7b227c9 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/wm831x-spi.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/wm831x-spi.c
@@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ static int wm831x_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
if (spi->dev.of_node) {
of_id = of_match_device(wm831x_of_match, &spi->dev);
+ if (!of_id) {
+ dev_err(&spi->dev, "Failed to find matching id\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
type = (enum wm831x_parent)of_id->data;
} else {
type = (enum wm831x_parent)id->driver_data;
What do you think?
I'd really appreciate any comment on this.
Thank you!
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva
Powered by blists - more mailing lists