[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170524072258.7qnnnrdodjwc55lk@dell>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 08:22:58 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Cc: patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [mfd] question about potential null pointer dereference
On Tue, 23 May 2017, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> While looking into Coverity ID 1408830 I ran into the following piece of
> code at drivers/mfd/wm831x-spi.c:26
>
> 26static int wm831x_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> 27{
> 28 struct wm831x_pdata *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&spi->dev);
> 29 const struct spi_device_id *id = spi_get_device_id(spi);
> 30 const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> 31 struct wm831x *wm831x;
> 32 enum wm831x_parent type;
> 33 int ret;
> 34
> 35 if (spi->dev.of_node) {
> 36 of_id = of_match_device(wm831x_of_match, &spi->dev);
> 37 type = (enum wm831x_parent)of_id->data;
> 38 } else {
> 39 type = (enum wm831x_parent)id->driver_data;
> 40 }
> 41
> 42 wm831x = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(struct wm831x),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> 43 if (wm831x == NULL)
> 44 return -ENOMEM;
> 45
> 46 spi->mode = SPI_MODE_0;
> 47
> 48 spi_set_drvdata(spi, wm831x);
> 49 wm831x->dev = &spi->dev;
> 50 wm831x->type = type;
> 51
> 52 wm831x->regmap = devm_regmap_init_spi(spi, &wm831x_regmap_config);
> 53 if (IS_ERR(wm831x->regmap)) {
> 54 ret = PTR_ERR(wm831x->regmap);
> 55 dev_err(wm831x->dev, "Failed to allocate register map:
> %d\n",
> 56 ret);
> 57 return ret;
> 58 }
> 59
> 60 if (pdata)
> 61 memcpy(&wm831x->pdata, pdata, sizeof(*pdata));
> 62
> 63 return wm831x_device_init(wm831x, spi->irq);
> 64}
>
> The issue here is that there is a potential NULL pointer dereference at line
> 37, in case function of_match_device() returns NULL.
>
> Maybe a patch like the following could be applied in order to avoid any
> chance of a NULL pointer dereference:
I do not believe it's possible for of_match_device() to return NULL in
this case.
However, if you wanted to submit a patch checking for it, it would not
be rejected.
> index c332e28..7b227c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/wm831x-spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/wm831x-spi.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ static int wm831x_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>
> if (spi->dev.of_node) {
> of_id = of_match_device(wm831x_of_match, &spi->dev);
> + if (!of_id) {
> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "Failed to find matching id\n");
"Failed to match device"
> + return -EINVAL;
-ENODEV
> type = (enum wm831x_parent)of_id->data;
> } else {
> type = (enum wm831x_parent)id->driver_data;
>
> What do you think?
>
> I'd really appreciate any comment on this.
>
> Thank you!
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists