[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9caa87dc05f947198670bc8c5123d941@svr-chch-ex1.atlnz.lc>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 20:29:09 +0000
From: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
CC: "linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] mtd: mchp23k256: Add support for mchp23lcv1024
On 23/05/17 19:19, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> BTW, it's really weird to have the _flash extension in the struct name,
> while we're actually dealing with SRAMs.
Agreed. After the dust settles on this series I'll send a trivial patch
to change "flash" to something sensible like "sram" or "chip".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists