[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170523115217.GM13759@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 13:52:17 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] mtd: mchp23k256: device tree and mchp23lcv1024
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:39:57AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2017 12:43:12 +1200
> Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
>
> > This series adds device tree support to the mchp23k256 driver and
> > support for the mchp23lcv1024 chip. I suspect there are more compatible
> > variants that we could now enumerate if desired.
> >
> > Chris Packham (5):
> > mtd: mchp23k256: Add OF device ID table
> > mtd: mchp23k256: switch to mtd_device_register()
> > mtd: handle partitioning on devices with 0 erasesize
> > mtd: mchp23k256: add partitioning support
> > mtd: mchp23k256: Add support for mchp23lcv1024
>
> Shouldn't we add a spi_device_id table to allow non-DT users to probe
> mchp23lcv1024 chips?
Hi Boris
This is something which can be added at any time. Currently there is
no need for it, so i personally would wait until somebody does need
it.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists