linux-kernel - Re: [WARNING] x86/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping at address ..

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170523185912.05346057@vmware.local.home>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2017 18:59:12 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [WARNING] x86/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping at address ..

On Tue, 23 May 2017 22:48:19 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:


> It's not KPROBES, it's the new fangled ftrace trampoline code. I
> added a few printks. All the leaked W+X mappings are allocated via
> this callchain:

The trampoline code isn't new. But it has new users because of the
introduction to synchronize_rcu_tasks(), and there was a bug I fixed in
-rc2 that moved it down because the test was run before
synchronize_rcu_tasks() was functional.

Is this still a bug in rc2?

-- Steve


> 
> [    2.620465]  module_alloc+0x8e/0xa0
> [    2.620764]  ? __fentry__+0x10/0x10
> [    2.621049]  arch_ftrace_update_trampoline+0x9f/0x220
> [    2.621453]  ? ftrace_caller+0x64/0x64
> [    2.621754]  ? __fentry__+0x10/0x10
> [    2.622047]  ftrace_startup+0x90/0x200
> [    2.622352]  register_ftrace_function+0x50/0x70
> [    2.622725]  function_trace_init+0x6d/0xa0
> [    2.623057]  trace_selftest_startup_function+0x63/0x4a8
> [    2.623477]  run_tracer_selftest+0xfe/0x16c
> [    2.623813]  init_trace_selftests+0x5d/0x103
> [    2.624163]  ? set_tracepoint_printk+0x3d/0x3d
> [    2.624525]  do_one_initcall+0x44/0x170
> [    2.624845]  kernel_init_freeable+0x1ff/0x287
> [    2.625199]  ? rest_init+0x140/0x140
> [    2.625491]  kernel_init+0xe/0x110
> [    2.625775]  ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x40
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx