[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1705240819320.2201@nanos>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 08:20:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [WARNING] x86/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping at address ..
On Tue, 23 May 2017, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2017 22:48:19 +0200 (CEST)
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
>
> > It's not KPROBES, it's the new fangled ftrace trampoline code. I
> > added a few printks. All the leaked W+X mappings are allocated via
> > this callchain:
>
> The trampoline code isn't new. But it has new users because of the
> introduction to synchronize_rcu_tasks(), and there was a bug I fixed in
> -rc2 that moved it down because the test was run before
> synchronize_rcu_tasks() was functional.
>
> Is this still a bug in rc2?
Yes. Otherwise we wouldn't talking about.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists