[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170523084956.GB20121@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 10:49:56 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/23] afs: switch to use uuid_t and uuid_gen
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 09:49:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > struct afs_call *call = container_of(work, struct afs_call,
> > work);
> > - struct uuid_v1 *r = call->request;
> > + uuid_t *r = call->request;
> >
> > struct {
> > __be32 match;
> >
>
> Just to double check that this doesn't create a union aliasing.
What do you mean with that?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists