[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170524081848.dozbpzdbi5syyyx2@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 10:18:48 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] x86/mm: Pass flush_tlb_info to
flush_tlb_others() etc
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> Rather than passing all the contents of flush_tlb_info to
> flush_tlb_others(), pass a pointer to the structure directly. For
> consistency, this also removes the unnecessary cpu parameter from
> uv_flush_tlb_others() to make its signature match the other
> *flush_tlb_others() functions.
>
> This serves two purposes:
>
> - It will dramatically simplify future patches that change struct
> flush_tlb_info, which I'm planning to do.
>
> - struct flush_tlb_info is an adequate description of what to do
> for a local flush, too, so by reusing it we can remove duplicated
> code between local and remove flushes in a future patch.
>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 6 ++--
> arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 5 ++-
> arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 19 ++++++-----
> arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv.h | 9 ++---
> arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++------------------
> arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c | 10 +++---
> arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 10 +++---
> 7 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
I've picked up the first three patches, but this patch apparently clashes with
v4.12 changes:
patching file arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1109.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1170.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
patching file arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1427.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1440.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1454.
3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
Patch 10 is broken and patch 11 needs an Ack from the KVM guys so I'll wait for a
new series on top of the new x86/mm branch. (Which I'll push out once it passes
testing.)
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists