[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jK4LVywq0rB35wEcRAAAQubmTsPe1kTStUWmiVV-TC5wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 13:59:26 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: arm: eBPF JIT compiler
For what it's worth, I did an comparison of the numbers Shubham posted
in another thread for the JIT, comparing the eBPF interpreter with his
new JIT. The post is here:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg436402.html
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists