linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm: dma-mapping: Reset the device's dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2754945.XA69I2mJdj@avalon>
Date:   Fri, 26 May 2017 17:14:28 +0300
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:     Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     robin.murphy@....com, will.deacon@....com, joro@...tes.org,
        lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm: dma-mapping: Reset the device's dma_ops

Hi Sricharan,

Thank you for the patch.

On Friday 26 May 2017 16:13:37 Sricharan R wrote:
> arch_teardown_dma_ops() being the inverse of arch_setup_dma_ops()
> ,dma_ops should be cleared in the teardown path. Currently, only the
> device's iommu mapping structures are cleared in arch_teardown_dma_ops,
> but not the dma_ops. So on the next reprobe, dma_ops left in place is
> stale from the first IOMMU setup, but iommu mappings has been disposed
> of. This is a problem when the probe of the device is deferred and
> recalled with the IOMMU probe deferral.
> 
> So for fixing this, slightly refactor by moving the code from
> __arm_iommu_detach_device to arm_iommu_detach_device and cleanup
> the former. This takes care of resetting the dma_ops in the teardown
> path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
> Fixes: 09515ef5ddad ("of/acpi: Configure dma operations at probe time for
> platform/amba/pci bus devices")

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>

Could you please push this upstream along with "[PATCH] ARM: dma-mapping: 
Don't tear third-party mappings" ?

(And feel free to s/tear/tear down/ in the subject of that patch, I've only 
noticed now that I forgot one word)

> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index c742dfd..6e82e87 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -2311,7 +2311,14 @@ int arm_iommu_attach_device(struct device *dev,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_iommu_attach_device);
> 
> -static void __arm_iommu_detach_device(struct device *dev)
> +/**
> + * arm_iommu_detach_device
> + * @dev: valid struct device pointer
> + *
> + * Detaches the provided device from a previously attached map.
> + * This voids the dma operations (dma_map_ops pointer)
> + */
> +void arm_iommu_detach_device(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping;
> 
> @@ -2324,22 +2331,10 @@ static void __arm_iommu_detach_device(struct device
> *dev) iommu_detach_device(mapping->domain, dev);
>  	kref_put(&mapping->kref, release_iommu_mapping);
>  	to_dma_iommu_mapping(dev) = NULL;
> +	set_dma_ops(dev, NULL);
> 
>  	pr_debug("Detached IOMMU controller from %s device.\n", 
dev_name(dev));
>  }
> -
> -/**
> - * arm_iommu_detach_device
> - * @dev: valid struct device pointer
> - *
> - * Detaches the provided device from a previously attached map.
> - * This voids the dma operations (dma_map_ops pointer)
> - */
> -void arm_iommu_detach_device(struct device *dev)
> -{
> -	__arm_iommu_detach_device(dev);
> -	set_dma_ops(dev, NULL);
> -}
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_iommu_detach_device);
> 
>  static const struct dma_map_ops *arm_get_iommu_dma_map_ops(bool coherent)
> @@ -2379,7 +2374,7 @@ static void arm_teardown_iommu_dma_ops(struct device
> *dev) if (!mapping)
>  		return;
> 
> -	__arm_iommu_detach_device(dev);
> +	arm_iommu_detach_device(dev);
>  	arm_iommu_release_mapping(mapping);
>  }

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart