lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170530090652.GA1767@red-moon>
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2017 10:06:52 +0100
From:   Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To:     Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, robin.murphy@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, joro@...tes.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, tn@...ihalf.com, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
        okaya@...eaurora.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, frowand.list@...il.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        sudeep.holla@....com, lenb@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
        arnd@...db.de, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, j.neuschaefer@....net,
        geert@...ux-m68k.org, magnus.damm@...il.com,
        nwatters@...eaurora.org, linux@...linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] ACPI/IORT: Ignore all errors except EPROBE_DEFER

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:36:42AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> On 5/28/2017 12:48 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, May 27, 2017 07:17:42 PM Sricharan R wrote:
> >> While deferring the probe of IOMMU masters, xlate and
> >> add_device callbacks called from iort_iommu_configure
> >> can pass back error values like -ENODEV, which means
> >> the IOMMU cannot be connected with that master for real
> >> reasons. Before the IOMMU probe deferral, all such errors
> >> were ignored. Now all those errors are propagated back,
> >> killing the master's probe for such errors. Instead ignore
> >> all the errors except EPROBE_DEFER, which is the only one
> >> of concern and let the master work without IOMMU, thus
> >> restoring the old behavior. Also make explicit that
> >> acpi_dma_configure handles only -EPROBE_DEFER from
> >> iort_iommu_configure.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 5a1bb638d567 ("drivers: acpi: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred probing or error")
> >> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 6 ++++++
> >>  drivers/acpi/scan.c       | 4 ++--
> >>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> >> index c5fecf9..16e101f 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> >> @@ -782,6 +782,12 @@ const struct iommu_ops *iort_iommu_configure(struct device *dev)
> >>  	if (err)
> >>  		ops = ERR_PTR(err);
> >>  
> >> +	/* Ignore all other errors apart from EPROBE_DEFER */
> >> +	if (IS_ERR(ops) && (PTR_ERR(ops) != -EPROBE_DEFER)) {
> >> +		dev_dbg(dev, "Adding to IOMMU failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(ops));
> >> +		ops = NULL;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >>  	return ops;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> >> index e39ec7b..3a10d757 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> >> @@ -1371,8 +1371,8 @@ int acpi_dma_configure(struct device *dev, enum dev_dma_attr attr)
> >>  	iort_set_dma_mask(dev);
> >>  
> >>  	iommu = iort_iommu_configure(dev);
> >> -	if (IS_ERR(iommu))
> >> -		return PTR_ERR(iommu);
> >> +	if (IS_ERR(iommu) && PTR_ERR(iommu) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> >> +		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> >>  
> >>  	size = max(dev->coherent_dma_mask, dev->coherent_dma_mask + 1);
> >>  	/*
> >>
> > 
> > ACK for the scan.c change and I'm assuming this to go in via ARM64.
> > 
> 
> Thanks for the ACK, should go through the IOMMU tree, since this fixes the IOMMU probe deferral
> that got merged through it.

Yes and it would be good to get them merged for -rc4 given that there
are bug fixes there, I agree the IOMMU tree is the way they should
go upstream.

Lorenzo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ