[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170530093212.GD2818@8bytes.org>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 11:32:13 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
Cc: robin.murphy@....com, will.deacon@....com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, tn@...ihalf.com, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
okaya@...eaurora.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, frowand.list@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sudeep.holla@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, arnd@...db.de, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, j.neuschaefer@....net,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, magnus.damm@...il.com,
nwatters@...eaurora.org, linux@...linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 07:17:40PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> Now with IOMMU probe deferral, we return -EPROBE_DEFER
> for masters that are connected to an IOMMU which is not
> probed yet, but going to get probed, so that we can attach
> the correct dma_ops. So while trying to defer the probe of
> the master, check if the of_iommu node that it is connected
> to is marked in DT as 'status=disabled', then the IOMMU is never
> is going to get probed. So simply return NULL and let the master
> work without an IOMMU.
>
> Fixes: 7b07cbefb68d ("iommu: of: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred probing or error")
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> Tested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Tested-by: Magnus Damn <magnus.damn@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Sorry for the confusion, I meant to apply this version of the patch-set
instead of v5.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists