lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170531153713.GA18802@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 31 May 2017 08:37:13 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 08/26] posix-timers: Move posix-timer internals to core

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:15:41PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> None of these declarations is required outside of kernel/time. Move them to
> an internal header.

It seems like struct k_clock itself could be marked private as well.

And with a small exported helper for /the /proc/timers implementation
struct k_itimer could be marked private, too.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ