[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1705311213320.17440@knanqh.ubzr>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 12:25:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [6/7] sched/rt: make it configurable
On Wed, 31 May 2017, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 05:03:01PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On most small systems where user space is tightly controlled, the realtime
> > scheduling class can often be dispensed with to reduce the kernel footprint.
> > Let's make it configurable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
> > ---
>
> > static inline int rt_prio(int prio)
> > {
> > - if (unlikely(prio < MAX_RT_PRIO))
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCHED_RT) && unlikely(prio < MAX_RT_PRIO))
> > return 1;
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS
> > INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&p->preempt_notifiers);
> > @@ -3716,13 +3720,18 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, struct task_struct *pi_task)
> > p->sched_class = &dl_sched_class;
> > } else
> > #endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_RT
> > if (rt_prio(prio)) {
>
> This ifdef is not necessary since rt_prio is conditioned on
> CONFIG_SCHED_RT already.
Yeah, that was the intent. In many places the conditioned code
dereferences p->rt.* and the compiler complains. So I added a couple
#ifdefs to make it build until something better comes to mind. This
particular one was unnecessary.
I'm on prettifying the whole thing at the moment. I wanted early
comments and so far they're all meaning the same thing which is good.
Nicolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists