[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170531162726.GZ20170@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 09:27:26 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Expose download-mode control
On 05/26, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> In order to aid post-mortem debugging the Qualcomm platforms provides a
> "memory download mode", where the boot loader will provide an interface
> for custom tools to "download" the content of RAM to a host machine.
>
> The mode is triggered by writing a magic value somehwere in RAM, that is
> read in the boot code path after a warm-restart. Two mechanism for
> setting this magic value are supported in modern platforms; a direct SCM
> call to enable the mode or through a secure io write of a magic value.
>
> In order for a normal reboot not to trigger "download mode" the magic
> must be cleared during a clean reboot.
>
> Download mode has to be enabled by including qcom_scm.download_mode=1 on
> the command line.
Why the kernel command line parameter? If we keep the kernel
command line param, perhaps we can also gain a config option to
make it default enabled or default disabled so that we don't have
to specify it on the commandline to get the feature all the time.
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.txt
> index 20f26fbce875..388817d1d00e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.txt
> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ Required properties:
> * Core, iface, and bus clocks required for "qcom,scm"
> - clock-names: Must contain "core" for the core clock, "iface" for the interface
> clock and "bus" for the bus clock per the requirements of the compatible.
> +- qcom,dload-mode-addr: Specifies the address (2 cells) for the download mode
> + magic (optional)
Was it decided that reg was improper? Or a phandle to a node that
has a reg property?
>
> Example for MSM8916:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> index e18d63935648..98f4747acddb 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/qcom_scm.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> @@ -28,6 +29,9 @@
>
> #include "qcom_scm.h"
>
> +static bool download_mode;
> +module_param(download_mode, bool, 0700);
0700? Not 0600? And what if we have it == 1 on the command line
and then write 0 at runtime with module param? Shouldn't we
handle that with a callback and turn off download mode there?
Otherwise when we reboot we will reboot into download mode?
> +
> #define SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK BIT(0)
> #define SCM_HAS_IFACE_CLK BIT(1)
> #define SCM_HAS_BUS_CLK BIT(2)
> @@ -365,6 +393,7 @@ static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct qcom_scm *scm;
> unsigned long clks;
> int ret;
> + u64 val;
>
> scm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!scm)
> @@ -418,9 +447,22 @@ static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> __qcom_scm_init();
>
> + ret = of_property_read_u64(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,dload-mode-addr", &val);
> + if (!ret)
> + scm->dload_mode_addr = val;
How about:
of_property_read_u64(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,dload-mode-addr",
&scm->dload_mode_addr)
> +
> + if (download_mode)
> + qcom_scm_set_download_mode(true);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> +void qcom_scm_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
static?
> +{
> + if (download_mode)
> + qcom_scm_set_download_mode(false);
> +}
> +
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists