linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] ACPI / sleep: Support power button wakeup from S2I on recent Dell laptops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gtfqUQs3efuKUcmg--Wtwz42Hz4hsXNBb-5bSDFPO3yQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Jun 2017 17:00:21 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@...l.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ACPI / sleep: Support power button wakeup from S2I on
 recent Dell laptops

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 01:23 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This is a follow-up for a patch series posted some time ago:
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=149324246701378&w=2
>>
>> The first two patches from that series are in 4.12-rc already and the
>> rest
>> have been rearranged.
>>
>
> ...
>
>> The first two patches in the current series  update the drivers used
>> for button
>> events processing on the affected systems so that they signal wakeup
>> as
>> expected and avoid propagating the wakeup events as button events to
>> user
>> space.
>
> ...
>
>> There is no code dependency between patches [1-2/3] and patch [3/3],
>> but all
>> of them together are necessary for the feature in question to work on
>> both the
>> affected systems, so IMO they should be applied together.
>>
>> The series is available from a git branch at
>>
>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git
>> s2idle-dell-test
>>
>> and has been included into the testing branch thereof.
>>
>> If there are any concerns regarding this series, please let me know.
>
> Is this supposed to go via linux PM tree?

Yes, it is.

> I'm fine with the first two:
> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

Thanks!