[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c346b84-57c5-e39d-fe9b-6bfddfe0864f@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:38:38 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
To: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>,
Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/vm: Fix test for virtual address range
mapping for arm64
On 05/18/2017 06:52 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Arm64 has 256TB address space so fix the test to pass on Arm as well.
>
> Also remove unneeded numaif header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Thanks. Applied to linux-kselftest next for 4.13-rc1
-- Shuah
> ---
> v2:
> - do not test high slices on Arm64 - it has no support and none is planned
> - fix the hint calculation for different shift
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/virtual_address_range.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/virtual_address_range.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/virtual_address_range.c
> index 3b02aa6eb9da..1830d66a6f0e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/virtual_address_range.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/virtual_address_range.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
> #include <string.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> -#include <numaif.h>
> #include <sys/mman.h>
> #include <sys/time.h>
>
> @@ -32,15 +31,33 @@
> * different areas one below 128TB and one above 128TB
> * till it reaches 512TB. One with size 128TB and the
> * other being 384TB.
> + *
> + * On Arm64 the address space is 256TB and no high mappings
> + * are supported so far.
> */
> +
> #define NR_CHUNKS_128TB 8192UL /* Number of 16GB chunks for 128TB */
> -#define NR_CHUNKS_384TB 24576UL /* Number of 16GB chunks for 384TB */
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_256TB (NR_CHUNKS_128TB * 2UL)
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_384TB (NR_CHUNKS_128TB * 3UL)
>
> #define ADDR_MARK_128TB (1UL << 47) /* First address beyond 128TB */
> +#define ADDR_MARK_256TB (1UL << 48) /* First address beyond 256TB */
> +
> +#ifdef __aarch64__
> +#define HIGH_ADDR_MARK ADDR_MARK_256TB
> +#define HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT 49
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_LOW NR_CHUNKS_256TB
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_HIGH 0
> +#else
> +#define HIGH_ADDR_MARK ADDR_MARK_128TB
> +#define HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT 48
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_LOW NR_CHUNKS_128TB
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_HIGH NR_CHUNKS_384TB
> +#endif
>
> static char *hind_addr(void)
> {
> - int bits = 48 + rand() % 15;
> + int bits = HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT + rand() % (63 - HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT);
>
> return (char *) (1UL << bits);
> }
> @@ -50,14 +67,14 @@ static int validate_addr(char *ptr, int high_addr)
> unsigned long addr = (unsigned long) ptr;
>
> if (high_addr) {
> - if (addr < ADDR_MARK_128TB) {
> + if (addr < HIGH_ADDR_MARK) {
> printf("Bad address %lx\n", addr);
> return 1;
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> - if (addr > ADDR_MARK_128TB) {
> + if (addr > HIGH_ADDR_MARK) {
> printf("Bad address %lx\n", addr);
> return 1;
> }
> @@ -79,12 +96,12 @@ static int validate_lower_address_hint(void)
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> - char *ptr[NR_CHUNKS_128TB];
> - char *hptr[NR_CHUNKS_384TB];
> + char *ptr[NR_CHUNKS_LOW];
> + char *hptr[NR_CHUNKS_HIGH];
> char *hint;
> unsigned long i, lchunks, hchunks;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < NR_CHUNKS_128TB; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_CHUNKS_LOW; i++) {
> ptr[i] = mmap(NULL, MAP_CHUNK_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
>
> @@ -99,7 +116,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> }
> lchunks = i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < NR_CHUNKS_384TB; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_CHUNKS_HIGH; i++) {
> hint = hind_addr();
> hptr[i] = mmap(hint, MAP_CHUNK_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists