linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] mfd: Remove redundant i2c_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Jun 2017 03:44:38 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, milo.kim@...com,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] mfd: Remove redundant i2c_device_id

* Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com> [170606 00:52]:
> On Tuesday 06 June 2017 01:00 PM, Keerthy wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 June 2017 12:47 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>>> Are all of these drivers DT only?
> >>>
> >>> At least i did not find any platform code calling on to these drivers.
> >>> No dependency on OF as such. Hence sent these 9.
> >>
> >> I can't accept these changes on any drivers which does not depend on
> >> OF as a hard requirement.
> > 
> > Okay. So that is a per-requisite. At least palmas, tps65218, lp873x,
> > tps65217 imho can have the OF dependency. I will post patches for that
> > and then will resurrect this series.
> > 
> > Thanks for your feedback.
> 
> Tony,
> 
> I do not see any platform specific code for tps65218, tps65217 and
> palmas. I believe they are all completely Device Tree based. Can i make
> them depend on OF? It helps me clear up some unused data from their mfd
> drivers.

Yes all of arch/arm/mach-omap2 is device tree only nowadays.
There may be other SoCs or architectures using these too,
but grepping for platform_data should reveal that.

Regards,

Tony