[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 16:31:33 +0530
From: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, <milo.kim@...com>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] mfd: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
On Tuesday 06 June 2017 04:14 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com> [170606 00:52]:
>> On Tuesday 06 June 2017 01:00 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 06 June 2017 12:47 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>>> Are all of these drivers DT only?
>>>>>
>>>>> At least i did not find any platform code calling on to these drivers.
>>>>> No dependency on OF as such. Hence sent these 9.
>>>>
>>>> I can't accept these changes on any drivers which does not depend on
>>>> OF as a hard requirement.
>>>
>>> Okay. So that is a per-requisite. At least palmas, tps65218, lp873x,
>>> tps65217 imho can have the OF dependency. I will post patches for that
>>> and then will resurrect this series.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your feedback.
>>
>> Tony,
>>
>> I do not see any platform specific code for tps65218, tps65217 and
>> palmas. I believe they are all completely Device Tree based. Can i make
>> them depend on OF? It helps me clear up some unused data from their mfd
>> drivers.
>
> Yes all of arch/arm/mach-omap2 is device tree only nowadays.
> There may be other SoCs or architectures using these too,
> but grepping for platform_data should reveal that.
Yes Tony. I did that for all the above mentioned devices. I did not find
any references apart from device tree folder under arch/ folder.
Apart from device tree folder and drivers/ folder i do not see any
instances of palmas, tps65218, tps65917, lp873x.
Shall i go ahead and introduce dependency on OF?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists