[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 18:25:37 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] kernel/events: Introduce IOC_COUNT_RECORDS
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 08:21:18PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Many perf sideband events (context switches, namespaces, ...) are useful
> by themselves without the need for subscribing to any overflow events.
> However, it is not possible to subscribe for notifications when such
> records are logged into the ring buffer. Introduce IOC_COUNT_RECORDS as
> a way to request this.
>
> With IOC_COUNT_RECORDS set, IOC_REFRESH takes the number of records
> after which to generate a notification, rather than the number of
> overflow events.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
> kernel/events/core.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> kernel/events/ring_buffer.c | 9 +++++++++
> 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index 24a635887f28..016f2da2bba7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -683,6 +683,7 @@ struct perf_event {
> struct irq_work pending;
>
> atomic_t event_limit;
> + bool count_records;
This is an instant nack ;-) Never, that is _never_ use bool in composite
types.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists