linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] thermal/cpu idle cooling: Introduce cpu idle cooling driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 7 Jun 2017 23:59:12 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Tao Wang <kevin.wangtao@...ilicon.com>,
        "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>, amit.kachhap@...il.com,
        javi.merino@...nel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        sunzhaosheng@...ilicon.com,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        jean.wangtao@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] thermal/cpu idle cooling: Introduce cpu idle
 cooling driver

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 09:11:35AM +0530, viresh kumar wrote:
>> + Daniel
>
> Hi Viresh,
>
> thanks for the head up.
>
> Before going deeply in the review, I have a dumb question:
>
> Why isn't this mechanism implemented at the scheduler level?

I suppose for the same reason why intel_powerclamp is not implemented
like that: the scheduler maintainers don't like the idea.

Thanks,
Rafael