[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0j8Jg+KuPNtAY6SS2M2g03i8_m2Eja67XtM7H=ub_1A8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 23:59:12 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Tao Wang <kevin.wangtao@...ilicon.com>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>, amit.kachhap@...il.com,
javi.merino@...nel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
sunzhaosheng@...ilicon.com,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
jean.wangtao@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] thermal/cpu idle cooling: Introduce cpu idle
cooling driver
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 09:11:35AM +0530, viresh kumar wrote:
>> + Daniel
>
> Hi Viresh,
>
> thanks for the head up.
>
> Before going deeply in the review, I have a dumb question:
>
> Why isn't this mechanism implemented at the scheduler level?
I suppose for the same reason why intel_powerclamp is not implemented
like that: the scheduler maintainers don't like the idea.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists