lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170608044341.GA1171@kmp-mobile.hq.kempniu.pl>
Date:   Thu, 8 Jun 2017 06:43:41 +0200
From:   Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@...l.com>,
        Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/16] platform/x86: wmi: Instantiate all devices before
 adding them

> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:43:39PM +0200, Michał Kępień wrote:
> >> I know I have probably started sounding like a broken record by now, but
> >> I still have not seen any response (apart from the typos getting fixed)
> >> to my comments on this patch which I posted in January 2016 [1].
> >>
> >> None of the issues I found back then are really critical, but I did
> >> point out a potential memory leak (granted, an unlikely one), so it
> >> might be a good idea to at least take a second look before merging.
> >>
> >> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg08201.html
> >
> > Thanks for being persistent, some good points in there. I'd like to just squash
> > these into this patch (9/16), but I'll include them here for an ack from you and
> > Andy L. that this is what you meant, and consistent with his
> > intent/understanding:
> >
> 
> Looks good to me.

Same here.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Kępień

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ