linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 20/35] openrisc: defconfig: Cleanup from old Kconfig options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170610164227.o5t5yei4lrazduu7@kozik-lap>
Date:   Sat, 10 Jun 2017 18:42:27 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
        Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
        openrisc@...ts.librecores.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/35] openrisc: defconfig: Cleanup from old Kconfig
 options

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 05:13:54PM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 06:10:31PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Remove old, dead Kconfig option INET_LRO. It is gone since
> > commit 7bbf3cae65b6 ("ipv4: Remove inet_lro library").
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/openrisc/configs/or1ksim_defconfig | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/openrisc/configs/or1ksim_defconfig b/arch/openrisc/configs/or1ksim_defconfig
> > index eb3fc581cf20..a73aa90501be 100644
> > --- a/arch/openrisc/configs/or1ksim_defconfig
> > +++ b/arch/openrisc/configs/or1ksim_defconfig
> > @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ CONFIG_INET=y
> >  # CONFIG_INET_XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT is not set
> >  # CONFIG_INET_XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL is not set
> >  # CONFIG_INET_XFRM_MODE_BEET is not set
> > -# CONFIG_INET_LRO is not set
> >  # CONFIG_INET_DIAG is not set
> >  CONFIG_TCP_CONG_ADVANCED=y
> >  # CONFIG_TCP_CONG_BIC is not set
> 
> Thanks, please let me know if you want me to take this, but it looks like
> you plan to push the whole series in via another route.
> 
> Acked-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>

Thanks, I did not mention the merging plan in cover letter but I think
the best way is to merge it through platform maintainers. Less
conflicts, I guess.

I'll be taking and sendin in pull request only ARM part.

So please go ahead and apply it.

Best regards,
Krzysztof