[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170612182931.GI19206@htj.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 14:29:31 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hch@....de, axboe@...com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, lizefan@...wei.com, Kernel-team@...com,
Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] kernfs: don't set dentry->d_fsdata
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 02:53:57PM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> @@ -570,7 +570,8 @@ static int kernfs_dop_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
> goto out_bad;
>
> /* The kernfs node has been moved? */
> - if (dentry->d_parent->d_fsdata != kn->parent)
> + if (d_really_is_negative(dentry->d_parent) ||
> + kernfs_dentry_node(dentry->d_parent) != kn->parent)
> goto out_bad;
Can we move d_really_is_negative() into kernfs_dentry_node()? That
might add an additional NULL test to some paths but I don't think that
will ever show up anywhere.
> diff --git a/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h b/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h
> index 3534cfe..82e11fa 100644
> --- a/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h
> +++ b/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h
> @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ struct kernfs_super_info {
> };
> #define kernfs_info(SB) ((struct kernfs_super_info *)(SB->s_fs_info))
>
> +#define kernfs_dentry_node(d) ((d_inode(d))->i_private)
I know the prev one is a macro but let's make the new one an inline
function.
Thnaks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists