[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170613080731.GB28618@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 09:07:31 +0100
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Prioritise consumer mappings over
regulator name
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 05:38:56PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 04:17:52PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
>
> > r = regulator_lookup_by_name(supply);
> > - if (r)
> > - return r;
>
> Why have you left the lookup here?
Yeah was thinking that could maybe use a comment, if we don't
find a match in the following loop over the supply map then we
will exit with the regulator found here. So we can still use the
regulator name for lookup just we default to the supply map.
Thanks,
Charles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists