[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170613101556.7xrzohow27dujwv4@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:15:56 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Prioritise consumer mappings over
regulator name
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:07:31AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 05:38:56PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 04:17:52PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > > r = regulator_lookup_by_name(supply);
> > > - if (r)
> > > - return r;
> > Why have you left the lookup here?
> Yeah was thinking that could maybe use a comment, if we don't
> find a match in the following loop over the supply map then we
> will exit with the regulator found here. So we can still use the
> regulator name for lookup just we default to the supply map.
Why are we even doing the lookup here if we only use it if we fail to
find a supply mapping?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists