lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:15:56 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:     lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Prioritise consumer mappings over
 regulator name

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:07:31AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 05:38:56PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 04:17:52PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:

> > >  	r = regulator_lookup_by_name(supply);
> > > -	if (r)
> > > -		return r;

> > Why have you left the lookup here?

> Yeah was thinking that could maybe use a comment, if we don't
> find a match in the following loop over the supply map then we
> will exit with the regulator found here. So we can still use the
> regulator name for lookup just we default to the supply map.

Why are we even doing the lookup here if we only use it if we fail to
find a supply mapping?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ