linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: make a couple of functions static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq1poe8zoh2.fsf@oracle.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2017 21:05:29 -0400
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
        Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: make a couple of functions static


Colin,

> functions lpfc_nvmet_cleanup_io_context and
> lpfc_nvmet_setup_io_context can be made static as they do not need to
> be in global scope.
>
> Cleans up sparse warnings:
>   "warning: symbol 'lpfc_nvmet_cleanup_io_context' was not declared.
>    Should it be static?"
>   "warning: symbol 'lpfc_nvmet_setup_io_context' was not declared.
>    Should it be static?"

Applied to 4.13/scsi-queue, thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering