[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZwDpS_GrWTpZYK56YyTMnWjmEU_7fg-mPp3AA3+k6mMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:18:21 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Janos Laube <janos.dev@...il.com>,
Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@...glemail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers/clocksource/fttmr010: Implement delay timer
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com> wrote:
> I stumbled upon boot time savings (going from next-20170518 to
> next-20170609) which seem to shave off more than a second ([1]
> compared to [2]) so I also booted without patches ([3]).
> There seems to be improvement when these patches are applied.
Oh yes, using delay timers saves us the loop calibration time.
Actually I should mention that, it's pretty nice.
Thanks for testing!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists