[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKTCnz=4AKGnfF5HtcyMQot6zMgtOc+eRiZ5=G+MDYWAFN1bEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 09:40:43 +1000
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
David Nellans <dnellans@...dia.com>,
"cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [HMM-CDM 0/5] Cache coherent device memory (CDM) with HMM
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
> On 06/14/2017 02:38 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:20:23PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>> On 06/14/2017 01:11 PM, Jérôme Glisse wrote:
>>>> Cache coherent device memory apply to architecture with system bus
>>>> like CAPI or CCIX. Device connected to such system bus can expose
>>>> their memory to the system and allow cache coherent access to it
>>>> from the CPU.
>>> How does this interact with device memory that's enumerated in the new
>>> ACPI 6.2 HMAT? That stuff is also in the normal e820 and, by default,
>>> treated as normal system RAM. Would this mechanism be used for those
>>> devices as well?
>>>
>>> http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_2.pdf
>> It doesn't interact with that. HMM-CDM is a set of helper that don't
>> do anything unless instructed so. So for device memory to be presented
>> as HMM-CDM you need to hotplug it as ZONE_DEVICE(DEVICE_PUBLIC) which
>> can be done with the helper introduced in patch 2 of this patchset.
>
[Removing my cc'd email id and responding from a different address]
> I guess I'm asking whether we *should* instruct HMM-CDM to manage all
> coherent device memory. If not, where do we draw the line for what we
> use HMM-CDM, and for what we use the core MM?
>
If you believe the memory is managed by the device (and owned by a device
driver) I'd suggest using HMM-CDM. The idea behind HMM-CDM was that
it enables transparent migration of pages and its preferred when
locality of computation
and locality of memory access is the preferred model.
The other model was N_COHERENT_MEMORY that used the core MM, but
there were objections to exposing device memory using that technology.
Balbir Singh.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists