[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170615114159.11a1eece@firefly.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 11:41:59 +1000
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
To: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
David Nellans <dnellans@...dia.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [HMM-CDM 4/5] mm/memcontrol: support MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE and
MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC
On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:11:43 -0400
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com> wrote:
> HMM pages (private or public device pages) are ZONE_DEVICE page and
> thus need special handling when it comes to lru or refcount. This
> patch make sure that memcontrol properly handle those when it face
> them. Those pages are use like regular pages in a process address
> space either as anonymous page or as file back page. So from memcg
> point of view we want to handle them like regular page for now at
> least.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
> Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> kernel/memremap.c | 2 ++
> mm/memcontrol.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/memremap.c b/kernel/memremap.c
> index da74775..584984c 100644
> --- a/kernel/memremap.c
> +++ b/kernel/memremap.c
> @@ -479,6 +479,8 @@ void put_zone_device_private_or_public_page(struct page *page)
> __ClearPageActive(page);
> __ClearPageWaiters(page);
>
> + mem_cgroup_uncharge(page);
> +
A zone device page could have a mem_cgroup charge if
1. The old page was charged to a cgroup and the new page from ZONE_DEVICE then
gets the charge that we need to drop here
And should not be charged
2. If the driver allowed mmap based allocation (these pages are not on LRU
Since put_zone_device_private_or_public_page() is called from release_pages(),
I think the assumption is that 2 is not a problem? I've not tested the mmap
bits yet.
> page->pgmap->page_free(page, page->pgmap->data);
> }
> else if (!count)
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index b93f5fe..171b638 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -4391,12 +4391,13 @@ enum mc_target_type {
> MC_TARGET_NONE = 0,
> MC_TARGET_PAGE,
> MC_TARGET_SWAP,
> + MC_TARGET_DEVICE,
> };
>
> static struct page *mc_handle_present_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long addr, pte_t ptent)
> {
> - struct page *page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, ptent);
> + struct page *page = _vm_normal_page(vma, addr, ptent, true);
>
> if (!page || !page_mapped(page))
> return NULL;
> @@ -4407,13 +4408,20 @@ static struct page *mc_handle_present_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> if (!(mc.flags & MOVE_FILE))
> return NULL;
> }
> - if (!get_page_unless_zero(page))
> + if (is_device_public_page(page)) {
> + /*
> + * MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC means ZONE_DEVICE page and which have a
> + * refcount of 1 when free (unlike normal page)
> + */
> + if (!page_ref_add_unless(page, 1, 1))
> + return NULL;
> + } else if (!get_page_unless_zero(page))
> return NULL;
>
> return page;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SWAP) || defined(CONFIG_DEVICE_PRIVATE)
> static struct page *mc_handle_swap_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> pte_t ptent, swp_entry_t *entry)
> {
> @@ -4422,6 +4430,23 @@ static struct page *mc_handle_swap_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>
> if (!(mc.flags & MOVE_ANON) || non_swap_entry(ent))
> return NULL;
> +
> + /*
> + * Handle MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE which are ZONE_DEVICE page belonging to
> + * a device and because they are not accessible by CPU they are store
> + * as special swap entry in the CPU page table.
> + */
> + if (is_device_private_entry(ent)) {
> + page = device_private_entry_to_page(ent);
> + /*
> + * MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE means ZONE_DEVICE page and which have
> + * a refcount of 1 when free (unlike normal page)
> + */
> + if (!page_ref_add_unless(page, 1, 1))
> + return NULL;
> + return page;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Because lookup_swap_cache() updates some statistics counter,
> * we call find_get_page() with swapper_space directly.
> @@ -4582,6 +4607,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page *page,
> * 2(MC_TARGET_SWAP): if the swap entry corresponding to this pte is a
> * target for charge migration. if @target is not NULL, the entry is stored
> * in target->ent.
> + * 3(MC_TARGET_DEVICE): like MC_TARGET_PAGE but page is MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC
> + * or MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE (so ZONE_DEVICE page and thus not on the lru).
> *
> * Called with pte lock held.
> */
> @@ -4610,6 +4637,9 @@ static enum mc_target_type get_mctgt_type(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> */
> if (page->mem_cgroup == mc.from) {
> ret = MC_TARGET_PAGE;
> + if (is_device_private_page(page) ||
> + is_device_public_page(page))
> + ret = MC_TARGET_DEVICE;
> if (target)
> target->page = page;
> }
> @@ -4669,6 +4699,11 @@ static int mem_cgroup_count_precharge_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
>
> ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma);
> if (ptl) {
> + /*
> + * Note their can not be MC_TARGET_DEVICE for now as we do not
there
> + * support transparent huge page with MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC or
> + * MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE but this might change.
I am trying to remind myself why THP and MEMORY_DEVICE_* pages don't work well
together today, the driver could allocate a THP size set of pages and migrate it.
There are patches to do THP migration, not upstream yet. Could you remind me
of any other limitations?
Balbir Singh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists