[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170614054550.14469-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 13:45:50 +0800
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mhocko@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH] base/memory: pass the base_section in add_memory_block
Based on Greg's comment, cc it to mm list.
The original thread could be found https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/6/7/202
The second parameter of init_memory_block() is used to calculate the
start_section_nr of this block, which means any section in the same block
would get the same start_section_nr.
This patch passes the base_section to init_memory_block(), so that to
reduce a local variable and a check in every loop.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
---
drivers/base/memory.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
index cc4f1d0cbffe..1e903aba2aa1 100644
--- a/drivers/base/memory.c
+++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
@@ -664,21 +664,20 @@ static int init_memory_block(struct memory_block **memory,
static int add_memory_block(int base_section_nr)
{
struct memory_block *mem;
- int i, ret, section_count = 0, section_nr;
+ int i, ret, section_count = 0;
for (i = base_section_nr;
(i < base_section_nr + sections_per_block) && i < NR_MEM_SECTIONS;
i++) {
if (!present_section_nr(i))
continue;
- if (section_count == 0)
- section_nr = i;
section_count++;
}
if (section_count == 0)
return 0;
- ret = init_memory_block(&mem, __nr_to_section(section_nr), MEM_ONLINE);
+ ret = init_memory_block(&mem, __nr_to_section(base_section_nr),
+ MEM_ONLINE);
if (ret)
return ret;
mem->section_count = section_count;
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists