linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: OMAP: PM: stop early on systems without twl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170614054727.GE3730@atomide.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2017 22:47:27 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Cc:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: OMAP: PM: stop early on systems without twl

* Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org> [170613 02:50]:
> From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> index 63027e60cc20..92e335decc61 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> @@ -240,6 +240,10 @@ omap_postcore_initcall(omap2_common_pm_init);
>  
>  int __init omap2_common_pm_late_init(void)
>  {
> +#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_TWL6040_CORE) || IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_TWL4030_CORE)
> +	if (!twl_rev())
> +		goto no_twl;
> +
>  	/* Init the voltage layer */
>  	omap3_twl_init();
>  	omap4_twl_init();
> @@ -253,4 +257,9 @@ int __init omap2_common_pm_late_init(void)
>  	omap_devinit_smartreflex();
>  
>  	return 0;
> +
> +no_twl:
> +#endif
> +	pr_err("OMAP4 PM not supported!\n");
> +	return -ENODEV;

This should probably just say "OMAP4 SmartReflex not supported".
We already have omap4 CPUs hit off mode during idle. What's
missing is save and restore of registers for various domains.

SmartReflex is also doable without twl PMICs, at least ti81xx
are doing SmartReflex over a group of GPIO pins without twl.

So maybe just put the twl specific parts into IS_BUILTIN so
we can optionally add other PM init here if needed?

Regards,

Tony