linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] includes: dt-bindings: Rename STM32F429 pinctrl DT bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJHFmamtr_o852fsbzq2S6V0i+xWi62=3HJ0w5F=3SG6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jun 2017 08:05:52 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Cc:     Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] includes: dt-bindings: Rename STM32F429 pinctrl DT bindings

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Alexandre Torgue
<alexandre.torgue@...com> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Gentle ping.
>
> On 04/12/2017 03:31 PM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On 04/10/2017 10:27 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
>>>>
>>>> STM32F4 MCU series is composed of several SOC (STM32F429, STM32F469,
>>>> ...).
>>>> Most of muxing definition are identical. So to avoid to duplicate
>>>> bindings
>>>> definition, this patch create common definitions.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is a lot of churn. Some confirmation that the resultant dtb is the
>>> same before and after would be nice. Perhaps the script you used to
>>> convert this as well.
>>
>>
>> I tried to use fdtdump but it seems bugged. So I used directly dtc
>> binary to (re)generate dts files (before and after apply the series) and
>> I compared "pinmux" field in both case.
>>
>> Example on stm32f469-disco:
>>
>> ./scripts/dtc/dtc -I dtb -O dts -o stm32f469-disco-after.dts
>> stm32f469-disco-after.dtb
>>
>> ./scripts/dtc/dtc -I dtb -O dts -o stm32f469-disco-before.dts
>> stm32f469-disco-before.dtb
>>
>> cat stm32f469-disco-after.dts | grep pinmux
>> cat stm32f469-disco-before.dts | grep pinmux
>>
>
> Do you agree with verifications ?

I would expect you do "diff -u stm32f469-disco-before.dts
stm32f469-disco-after.dts".

Rob