linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 5/6] i2c: designware: add SLAVE mode functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6e332d71-1891-21aa-4479-b91a7550f8af@synopsys.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:06:45 +0100
From:   Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira@...opsys.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira@...opsys.com>
CC:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ramiro Oliveira <Ramiro.Oliveira@...opsys.com>,
        Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
        <CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/6] i2c: designware: add SLAVE mode functions

On 14-Jun-17 13:20, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Luis Oliveira
> <Luis.Oliveira@...opsys.com> wrote:
>> - Changes in Kconfig to enable I2C_DESIGNWARE_SLAVE support
>> - Slave functions added to core library file
>> - Slave abort sources added to common source file
>> - New driver: i2c-designware-slave added
>> - Changes in the Makefile to compile the I2C_DESIGNWARE_SLAVE module
>>   when supported by the architecture.
>>
>> All the SLAVE flow is added but it is not enabled via platform
>> driver.
> 
>> +       //~ if (stat & DW_IC_INTR_TX_OVER)
>> +               //~ dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_CLR_TX_OVER);
> 
> If you are going to ignore reviewers' comments you will delay your
> work to be applied.
> 
Im so sorry. I was doing some tests on the irq_handler and used the wrong branch
to create the patchset.
Believe me I've looked for mistakes like this but I've read the code so many
times I don't think I can see the obvious anymore.

> Certainly you are about to miss v4.13.
>