[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170615075059.GD5902@dragon>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 15:51:01 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: Jagan Teki <jagan@...nedev.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Matteo Lisi <matteo.lisi@...icam.com>,
Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] ARM: dts: imx6ul-isiot: Add Sound card with codec
node
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 01:01:22PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > I feel the abstraction is wrong from the beginning. Ideally, we should
> > have something like below.
> >
> > - imx6ul-isiot.dtsi
> > - imx6ul-isiot-kit.dts and imx6ul-isiot-carrier.dts
> >
> > The -isiot should have everything on SoM and common stuff between -kit
> > and -carrier boards, while -kit and -carrier include -isiot and contains
> > the base-board specific things. The -isiot can have both emmc and nand
> > devices with "disabled" status, and let firmware turn device on per SoM
> > it boots. In that case, the abstraction level can be less and clearer.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> So,even the common stuff (lcdif, ts and etc) should be in -isiot.dtsi
Yes, anything common can be in -isiot.dtsi.
> and make it "disabled" and let them enabled on respective dts. this
> what you mentioned here?
It doesn't matter. If the lcd/touch is same on -kit and -carrier, you
can even have them enabled by default in -isiot.dtsi. The -kit.dts and
-carrier.dts are there to accommodate base-board specific differences.
Shawn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists