lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170615075207.frl24lgybya6ttgo@dell>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:52:07 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
Cc:     Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mfd: lp87565: Add lp87565 PMIC support

On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:

> Hello Lee and Keerthy,
> 
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Monday 12 June 2017 02:41 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> On Sun, 11 Jun 2017, Keerthy wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sunday 11 June 2017 10:36 AM, Keerthy wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Friday 09 June 2017 07:58 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 09:38:14AM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> >>>>>> The LP87565 chip is a power management IC for Portable Navigation Systems
> >>>>>> and Tablet Computing devices. It contains the following components:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>         - Configurable Bucks(Single and multi-phase).
> >>>>>>         - Configurable General Purpose Output Signals (GPO).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The LP87565-Q1 variant device uses two 2-phase outputs configuration,
> >>>>>> Buck0 is master for Buck0/1 output and Buck2 is master for Buck2/3
> >>>>>> output.
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> >>> Lee Jones,
> >>>
> >>> Shall i add back i2c_device_id as pointed here:
> >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1417316.html
> >>
> >> Hasn't that been fixed yet?
> >>
> 
> There are only 2 patch series remaining to be merged so we can finally
> fix this in the I2C core, making sure that no drivers will be
> regressed. One of the series is for MFD and have been around for a
> while (it already contains all the relevant acks AFAICT), it would be
> very helpful if you can look at it and merge if you think is correct:
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/4/11

Please use the normal procedure and [RESEND].

> >> I guess so then. :(
> >
> > Okay. So with that i assume i should reintroduce probe instead of probe_new.
> >
> 
> It's orthogonal, you can have probe_new and also the I2C device ID
> table (the OF table will be used for matching, you just need the I2C
> table to export the aliases with MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c,.. ).
> 
> Best regards,
> Javier

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ