[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871sqlzewc.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:09:07 +0300
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dawid Kurek <dawikur@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Reduce scope of 'state' variable
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Dawid Kurek <dawikur@...il.com> wrote:
> Smaller scope reduces visibility of variable and makes usage of
> uninitialized variable less possible.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> index f32506a..ea5a9a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> @@ -108,10 +108,11 @@ struct drm_atomic_state *
> drm_atomic_state_alloc(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> struct drm_mode_config *config = &dev->mode_config;
> - struct drm_atomic_state *state;
>
> if (!config->funcs->atomic_state_alloc) {
> - state = kzalloc(sizeof(*state), GFP_KERNEL);
> + struct drm_atomic_state *state
> + = kzalloc(sizeof(*state), GFP_KERNEL);
Separate declaration and initialization would lead to a cleaner patch
and result.
BR,
Jani.
> +
> if (!state)
> return NULL;
> if (drm_atomic_state_init(dev, state) < 0) {
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists