linux-kernel - Re: LTS testing with latest kselftests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAO_48GFhpaDjmsZJyrjpiLqzzsKWwe6Xq3UGY47w=GMFP3FaSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:08:04 +0530
From:   Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
To:     Alexander Alemayhu <alexander@...mayhu.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, shuah@...nel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>, mcgrof@...nel.org,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: LTS testing with latest kselftests - some failures

Hi Alexander,

On 16 June 2017 at 12:44, Alexander Alemayhu <alexander@...mayhu.com> wrote:
> Last time I saw similar kinds of errors gcc libraries were missing.
> Can you try rerunning after
>
>   apt-get install -y gcc-multilib g++-multilib

Thanks, this was quite helpful, and so now bpf tests build on x86_64
with current mainline for me. Perhaps we should document these
somewhere, as dependencies?

Best,
Sumit.