linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 33/44] openrisc: remove arch-specific dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:39:07 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org,
        "open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." <linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
        openrisc@...ts.librecores.org,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
        sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org" <linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org>,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/44] openrisc: remove arch-specific dma_supported
        implementation

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 02:20:42PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> > This implementation is simply bogus - hexagon only has a simple
> 
> openrisc?

Yeah.